The Madras High Court has held that an instrument,
whether a 'certificate of sale' or 'sale deed', issued in a public auction of properties, was chargeable with stamp duty under Article 18 read with Article
23 of Schedule I to the Indian Stamp Act, 1899.
Noting that there was an emerging trend among
purchasers of properties in public auctions to seek issue of Certificates of
Sale rather than Deeds of Sale, the Hon'ble High Court recalled that in Shree
Vijayalakshmi Charitable Trust case [Shree Vijayalakshmi Charitable Trust vs
Sub-Registrar, Erode Dt. (2009 (5) CTC 15] the view that a certificate of sale
did not attract stamp duty had found acceptance. But the question as to whether
stamp duty was payable on a certificate of sale was not examined in the said
case on a comparative analysis of all provisions of the Transfer of Property ct, 1882, the Stamp Duty Act and the Registration act, 1908, andsues of
repugnancy and the overriding effect of one act over the other, it was held.
Analyzing the Transfer of Property Act, the Hon'ble
High Court recalled that the Apex Court made it clear in Raghunath vs Kedar
Nath [1969 (1) SCC 497] that the documents of which registration was necessary,
fell within the scope of Section 49 of the Registration Act and that if not
registered, they were not admissible as evidence of any transaction affecting
any immovable property comprised therein.
irrespective of and dehors provisions of the
Registration act, a certificate of sale issued to a purchaser of property sold
in public auction, was required to be stamped as per Article 18 read with
Article 23 if the purchase money exceeded Rs.l 00 of Schedule I of the Stamp
Act. The provisions of the Stamp Act and the Registration Act operated on
parallel lines. Neither of them contains a non-abstante clause so as to exclude
operation of the other. The option given under the Registration Act to makers
of certain documents, to register them or not, was not to be construed as an
exemption from payment of stamp duty. Therefore, the only conclusion that could
be drawn by a combined reading of the three Acts was that by whatever name the
instrument was called, it was chargeable with stamp duty, it was held.
In view of the above, the application was disposed of
with a direction to the Official Liquidator to issue a certificate of sale or
execute a sale deed in line with the choice of the auction purchaser.
No comments:
Post a Comment