Sale of immovable property is an act
of contract between the parties, wherein each party to the contract has got
definite duties to be performed, such as, the vendor has to establish the clear and marketable title to the property and at the time of registration, has to
handover the title deeds along with vacant possession of the property. On the
other hand, the purchaser has to pay the sale consideration as agreed and co-operate
in completing the registration formalities.
It is very important for the seller
and the buyer to enter into an Agreement to sell before executing the Sale Deed. The reason is that such agreement will bind both the parties to the
agreement and make it obligatory to perform their duties as envisaged in the
agreement.
The seller and the buyer will be on
the disadvantageous position if the agreement is not executed because the
purchaser may not co-operate in paying consideration as agreed by both of them
and on the other hand, the seller may avoid or delay from proceeding to convey
the property at the time of registration, leading to misunderstanding and disputes between the parties. So it is advisable to execute agreement to sell
prior to executing the sale deed.
Generally, vacant possession of the
property is handed over to the purchaser at the time of registration, but in
certain cases, the vendor will handover vacant possession of the property to
the purchaser before the registration of the sale deed. This act of the parties
to the contract is called part performance.
Section 53-A of Transfer of Property Act recognizes part performance. The purchaser,
who gets possession of the property under terms of contracts, pending registration of sale deed, gets equitable rights.
The seller cannot enforce eviction against the purchaser once he has parted with possession of the property as per
the agreed terms of contract. The purchaser can enjoy peaceful possession of
the property even before the sale deed is executed and registered. Section 29 of Registration Act also recognizes the part performance.
Mandatory Conditions: Section 53-A
of Transfer of property Act stipulates certain mandatory conditions to
establish part performance of the contract, as discussed below:
1. The transaction must be a
contract for transfer of immovable property for consideration.
2. The contract must be III writing.
3. It must have been signed by the
seller or his authorized agent.
4. The terms of contract should be
clear, unambiguous and certain, wherein the act of part performance should also
be part of the contract.
5. The vendor, in pursuance of the
contract should put the purchaser in vacant possession of the property. The
purchaser should take the possession and if already in possession shall
continue to be in possession.
6. The purchaser must have made part
payment of the sale consideration and should be willing to perform his part of
terms and conditions agreed upon.
The equitable right bestowed on the
purchaser can be enforced by the purchaser against the seller or anybody claiming
under him. It cannot be enforced against party who has purchased the property
for consideration without the knowledge of contract of part performance. As
regards the right of the seller is concerned, the only remedy available for the
seller is to initiate civil suit against the purchaser, seeking recovery of the
balance of sale consideration.
The applicability of part
performance has two important ingredients, firstly, the existence of written
contract and secondly payment of consideration. The transfer should involve the
element of consideration to be paid by the transferee.
The concept of Part Performance is
not applicable in the case of gifts since the essence of the gift is transfer
of property without consideration and existence of consideration is mandatory
to ascertain as to v. hether the
contract involves part performance or not.
The doctrine of Part
Performance will not be available against other Co-Owners who are neither the
signatories nor have signed such an agreement as consenting witnesses. Thus,
even the agreement is valid to the extent of the seller's share, the same
cannot be enforced against the other co-owners since there is not privity of
contract between the purchaser and the other Co-owners.
The doctrine of Part
Performance cannot be invoked in case of property involving minor's share and
though the Guardian of the minor enters into the contract on behalf of the
minor, the same is not valid since minor is not competent to enter into contract
and enforcement of the contract by the minor is not valid.
Thus, it may be said that the
doctrine of Part Performance, as envisaged under the TP Act, confers only an
equitable right over the purchaser in order to defend his possession, but
cannot be enforced against those to whom the property is conveyed legally and
as required under law. Thus, Part performance is only a weapon to defend
possession having acquired under a legally valid agreement and it does not
validate the agreement or contract which is, prima-facie, illegal.
At the time of entering into the
agreement, both the seller and the purchaser should incorporate a clause which
would clearly depict the concept of part performance, by virtue of which the
purchaser will be handed over possession of the property.
However, if possession of the same
is agreed to be parted by the seller to the purchaser, then the stamp duty will
have to be paid on such agreement, which will be equivalent to the stamp duty
required to be paid on conveyance deed or sale deed.
No comments:
Post a Comment