Tuesday 31 December 2013

Indian Real Estate bogged down by Realtors and Finance Companies


     Indian Real Estate has been defined as wary for the last few months and may continue to do so for the next few months. It is easy to maintain that the global recessionary has had a hand in this and point fingers on the Government's ineptitude to bring about a change similar to the promises of the American President Barack Obama.

     The RBI's monetary policy in tandem with the economic stimuli in December 2008 and early January 2009 was aiming for liquidity in the market to wipe damp consumer sentiments. However, blame it on pettypolitics or the over-cautions approach of financial institutions or the ham-fisteddecisions in risk management of entrepreneurs and businessmen; it seems thatthe economic atyachar maycontinue.


     The fact of the matter is that policies by the Government and the RBI were not accepted in spirit. The Indian Institute of Plagiarism, a disease which has spread from Bollywood to money matters saw Indian giants seeking further help from the Government. In a letter dated the 5· of February 2009 to the Maharashtra Chief Minister Ashok Rao Chavan from the Maharashtra Chamber of Rousing Industry (MCRI), it requested a ‘Stimulus Package for Real Estate second demanding taxcuts and reduction of FSI rates. MCRI satirically had held an exhibition for affordable housing in Mumbai which was quoted “a success”. It is hard to refurbish success with hidden sordid agendas.


     The RBI’s move in reduction of interest rates was to facilitate home loan rates. SBI, like a supreme opportunist, announced a reduction of home loans to 8%. Other factors that were underplayed was the money margin, the loan-to-value rate increased drastically and also Credit Information Bureau (India) Limited (CIBIL), its illegitimate offspring tightened its noose to curtail mass borrowers through strict regulations on borrowers. This would ensure that the loans are not disbursed as per the fortitudeof the stimulus packages or the RBI’s interest rates reduction. It is important to note that the special discounted rates are applicable only for new customers and for a limited period, after which prevailing rates will be applicable. SBI's offer of 8% is only applicable for only one year and is valid up to May 2009. HDFC's special rate of 9.75% for a Rs 20 lakh loan with a 20 year tenure will be offered only up to the end of February 2009, beyond which prevailing rates will apply.

The length of time for which these lower rates can be availed of may be insufficient to make a decision on buying property, and therefore may not translate into transactions.

      HDFC marks the move by SBI as a 'gimmick'. SBI retorted that the move was to kick start demand in the market and was primarily meant for existing customers. With SBI and RDFC fighting like a soon-to-be- divorced couple, the inconsequent worry is what about their destructive son, CIBIL.


     The Interim Budget also received a lot of criticism which the acting finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee said was for the "aamaadmi". This can only be assumed to the overwhelming advantage rural India has had in shaping poll outcomes.
A laissez-faire economy talks about a minimum government intervention. Debates falredwhen, in 1969, 14 banks were nationalized by Prime Minister Mrs. Indira Gandhi. We have come a long way from the clutches of national bankruptcy in 1991 when the Finance Minister and the current Prime Minister Manmohan Singh broke the shackles of Socialism and let the economy loose towards Privatization. It has been a tedious journey since then and today adequate freedoms are promised by the state to private sectors. But then it's a system of checks and balances that avoids extremist philosophies like Anarcho- Capitalism or Market Anarchism. The Government has done its best to 'stimulate' the economy but if private sectors, like the one of Real Estate, need greater levels offoreplay then it may as well give up or chose ground breaking innovative avenues.


This leads on to practices employed by developers. When demand falls, prices drop too. This particular theory has not squirmed through the ears of developers.

     "When flats are more expensive, the dropwill be sharper than where the flats are cheaper. .. correction is bound tocome." HDFC Chairman Deepak Parekh told reporters recently. With speculative transactions leading to hyper inflated prices and massive land banks waiting to be seeded, developers are holding on to their prices. In 2007, prices in Thane were offered at Rs 3,000 per sq ft., and the prices are still at Rs 3,000 per sq ft. Fabricated market prices by builders are negating the  natural route of pricing. Al though there have been reports that property rates are now dipping in some quarters but the transition has not been as appropriate as expected.


     Furthermore, the Government has exercised its leniency towards foreign investment as well. Foreign investors who have less than 50% stake in an Indian company are treated as domestic equity thus limiting the definition of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI). This widens thehorizons for non-Indian investors but also keep a vigilant glance in terms ofits characterization. There has been denigration on some quarters that this may lead to exposure of the Indian economy to the global recessionary trends. But this neglects that foreign investors who have the capital to invest but cannot do so in Europe or Obama's America have India as a savior. It is a symbiotic relationship.


     The realty sector has proved the most sensitive to the prevailing economic crisis. Last month, the Realty index declined by more than a quarter. DLF and Unitech, prominent developers, exemplified the damage. Developers who last year bid for and won highly lucrative land deals are now struggling to service installment payments. Notable examples of this are the BBTP bid ofRs. 530 million per acre for a 95 acre prime commercial plot in Nodia, NCR.

     Rajeev Talwar, Group Executive Director at DLF, from an interview with CNBC, was of the belief that Realty equilibrium may reach as early as mid-2009. Cynics may deem this as too optimistic. The 'wait-and-watch' policy has waited quite a lot ignoring Government packages and ensuing slumps. CommercialReal Estate may salvage the ongoing recessionary trend when consumerism wakes upagain.






Sunday 29 December 2013

Recommendations of the Supreme Court Panel on forest land


 
       
Nearl5 lakh residents living on the periphery of the Sanjay Gandhi National Park (SGNP) like ThaneMulund and Vikhroli on the eastern suburbs and MaladKandivili and Poisar in the westernsuburbwere affected by a High Court verdict last year notifying their landSome hughousing complexes awell asettle ments in existence for over six decades were declared 'illegalin theverdict.

Prakash Paddikal of Mulund-based NGO Hillside Residents W elf are Association (HIRWA)said, "Based on the CEC's current suggestions and the Net Present Value for these lands, we have calculated that residents with OCs may have to paabout Rs 8-10 lakh to regularize their homes.Considering the pressure we have been under for so longthat seems an acceptable suggestion."

Afor residents without valid OCs, the CEC has agreed to consider their caseafter their applications with details are duly filedPaddikal said. HIRWAalong with the NGO People's Power of Nation, has beenfighting for the residentsrights for long.

Rajendra Manglurkar, joint secretary of the state Revenue and Forest department, said, "The illegal forest issue has been hanging in balance for the past 34 years and we want it to be resolved once for allIf the CEC's solution is acceptable to the publicweare more thanhappy with it."

       RECOMME DATIO S

One-time afforestation charges for forest land residents of pre-2006 buildings possessing valid occupation certificate or completion certificate.

Between 10 and 15 times afforestationcharges for residents who have booked flats in buildings under construction 20 times charges for areas which have been booked for development but work has not yet begun or iin initial stages.

No afforestation charges for farmers owning land in non- agricultural regions and government buildings in private forest lands. The Issue came to limelight in 2002 after the Bombay Environmental Action Group filed a petition in the Bombay High Court over encroachment on forest land. In 2005, the government told the HC that there were encroachments on private forest land.While HC ruling went againstresidentsand builders, residents associations filed a Special Leave Petition inthe SC,after which the panel was formed.

A Central Empowered Committee (CEChas been appointed by the Supreme Court on the forest land issue which iheaded by TV Jaikrishna and the Committee is reported to havvisited Thane,Mulund and Vikhroli on December 30,2008.

KOLKATA-BASEEdeCitProjecthas comup with new schemfor its residential projects, which requires an applicant to pay only 15 per cent of the cost on allotment and the remaining amount as monthly installments two years later, on getting the physical possession of the flat.

“Book now and start paying in 2011”, seems to the buzzword in the realty space. Explaning the sheme, Biswadeep Gupta, General Manager said, “In the scheme called Empower all one has to do is to fill up the prescribed application form with requisite booking amount, which is not very high.Pay 15 per cent of the total value on allotment and sign a home loan agreementwith thedeveloper's home loan partner (whichcould be HDFC, ICICI or someone else) andstart paying the rest ofthe money as equated monthly installments(EMI) onlyfrom 2011 onwards, after the developeractually gives physical possessionofflats.

An increasinnumber of developerarcominup with similaschemes, which ijust another namfor discountwithout actuallreducinthpricof property.

It meanone has enough timto save up for a house. People who pay rent would be spared from thburden of paying monthlinstallment also, and no interest would be charged for the interim period either.

Eden City Projects was one of the first to start the scheme when slowdowset inOthers such as Riverbank Holdings (whicis developing CalcuttRiversidProjects as Batanagar) and Ruchi Realty (which ideveloping Active Acres), followethe suit.

EdeCity's Empower claimthave more advantages than oneOncan buy a residential property at present prevailinprice, but start paying the EMI two years laterthat ifrom 2011onwards. One doesn't have to pay house rent and EMI togetherBesides, oncan choose thEMI tenure, of course, subjecto loan approval.

For two-bedroom flat of 796 sq ft, which comes with prictag of R14.9lakh witcar park,one has to pay Rs 2.24 lakh as booking amount and start paying EMI from 2011Similarlyfor a three-bedroom flat of 1,236 sftwhose price is Rs 22.57 lakhonhas to pay a booking amountRs 3.38Iakhhe said.

Ruchi Realty Holdings, the realty arm of Ruchi Industries, has also comup with a subvention schemeShivaAsthanavice-presidenoRuchi Realtysaihis companhas teamed up withHDFC to offethis subvention scheme. Interestinglythe developers in all succases are bearing the burden of re-EMl interestsFor allpractical purposes, therefore,it is all but a heavy discount offered tocustomers in a differentformat.

                                Bombav High Court issues Notice


The Bombay High Court has sent notices tRBI and others trespond to public interest litigation (PILthat sought the court's directive to bankto put up signboardon mortgaged lands on which construction was being undertaken.

A division bench of Chief Justice and JusticDhananjay Chandrachud was hearing PIL filed by one RajendrThacker against RBI, SyndicatBankHousing Development and Infrastructure (HDIL) and EnigmConstructions, which issued a brochurunder thbrand namRustomjee Estate.The brochure, however, did not mention that theland was partly mortgaged to a bank.

The petitioner'lawyer SumedhRasaid"We want banks to puup signboards stating that the land habeen mortgagedAlsothbankshould publish a list of propertieon which thehave amortgage ocharge." The petitioner's contention wasthatif the land's title was in dispute, the builder cannot 'convey' goodandmarketable title of the flat to owners unless the litigation over the titleends. Insuch cases, thbuyermay get cheated of their rights in the property for which thehave paid full consideration.

Ms Rao, further urged that the buildermay makit clear in their advertisements that land was mortgaged.



For more:
www.guidancevalue.com