Saturday 7 June 2014

An article about " Wanted for senior citizens – REVERSE MORTGAGE "



The other day, my friend and I went to another friends house who was bedridden and in great pain.  We are all Senior Citizens 65+.  In our working life we have acquitted ourselves respectably and retired with grace.  Our friend was diagnosed as a case of spondylitis, diabetes and cardio vascular problems.  He was a junior officer in a public Sector Undertaking of  Government of India.  He has exhausted almost all his funds in moving around the country on transfers, changing jobs, raising his siblings, giving them good education, and marrying them off in good and respectable families.  His one son is in America, a software engineer and another in UK, a doctor.  He and his wife live alone in Bangalore.  Both of them have one or the other medical problems.  His only assets are a flat in which he lives and some amount he gets which has been dwindling.  He cannot afford costly treatment and also beyond medical insurance.  His pride stands in the way of his asking for any money from his children.  Even if he suppresses his pride it is doubtful whether he will get any money from his children.  Not an odd story.  We can find many such cases around us, similar or worse.  However, the flat which he has is in a good locality, somewhat up market and has a decent market price.  The value has been appreciating.  But that will not help him, not in India.
A second example.  An educated entrepreneur of the yester-years.  Rags to riches story.  He had built a medium size enterprise in eighties.  Built a decent house in a upper class suburb.  No children.  He has closed down the business due to advancing age and medical problems.  Last few years of running has also seen some loss.  He has to live on his savings.  During the heydays of the business he had lived in some what luxurious way.
There is another story where both the son and daughter are abroad.  The individual has been advised by pass.  That would cost him at least Rupees two lakhs.  He is worried about raising it.  Both the children have told that they are not interested in the ancestral house in India as they and their children do not have the slightest intention of coming back to India.  They have told their families he can do whatever he wants with the house he lives in.
Today in our country such nuclear middle class families of senior citizens are growing in numbers.  In all the above cases the couples have apartments / houses which have good market value but as they have to live there they are locked up stocks in India.  The percentage of population above 60 is growing.  All these citizens have good chances of living for another 3 decades.  However it cannot be said that they will lead a healthy, active and cheerful life.
Some time ago ICICI Prudential Life Insurance released an advertisement under  retirement solutions which highlighted the problem of old age succinctly It read as under

     Age  35 ---   visits to the doctor 2times
     Age  55 ---   visits to the doctor 15times
     Age  70 ---   visits to the doctor 22 times
It also signed off with a statement “Retire from work, not life.”
Although medical science has advanced in leaps and bounds in the recent times cost of treatment has gone up because of the heavy investment in machinery andequipment the hospitals have to make.  We the senior citizens who were working class of the  socialistic era had no other insurance but Government administered Life Insurance and as far as I know there were no retirement solutions of the type offered by the advertisement.
In many other countries of the West a solution has been devised to meet situations stated above.  A senior citizen can borrow from the bank on monthly basis and yet live in the house until death or coming in to better circumstances.  The financial instrument that helps him is REVERSE MORTGAGE.
A reverse mortgage (known as equity withdrawal in the United Kingdom) is type of loan used by older consumers as a way of converting their home equity into a cash payment while retaining ownership of their property.  To qualify for a reverse mortgage, one must be at least 62 and have paid off all or most of home mortgage.
Reverse mortgage allows the home owner to continue living in the home  without being required to repay the loan.  In exchange, the lender receives a  substantial fraction of the home’s equity.  The proceeds of the loan are tax-free, there are no minimum income requirements, and for most reverse mortgages, the money can be used for any purpose. Government and the insurance fraternity together have made it simple and user friendly in procedure.  The mortgagee takes over the house on the death of mortgager, disposes of the house and recovers the amount and interest..  And balance is given to inheritors.
Lenders when granting reverse mortgages do generally not consider income of the person, and no medical tests or medical histories  are required.  The amount you can borrow depends on your age, the equity in your home, the value of your home, and the interest rate.  Reverse mortgages administered by the government may have other requirements as well.
In the United States, you can be paid in a lump sum, in monthly advances through a line of credit, or a combination of all three.  The loan advances which are not taxable, generally do not affect Social Security or Medicare benefits.  However, you should keep in mind that reverse mortgage tend to be more costly than traditional loan.
Whether seeking money to pay for medical treatment, finance a home improvement, buy long term care insurance, or supplement their income, many older Americans are turning to “reverse mortgages.”  The underlying principle is that the scheme allows older consumers to convert the equity in their homes to cash while retaining ownership of their property.
With a “regular” mortgage, one makes monthly payments to the lender.  But with a reverse mortgage, one receives money from the lender and generally does not have to  repay it for as long as one lives in own home.  In return, the lender holds some – if not most or all – of one’s home’s equity.
Depending on the plan, reverse mortgages generally allow home owners to retain title to their homes until they permanently move, sell their home, die or reach the end of pre-selected loan term.  Generally, a move is considered permanent when the homeowner has not lived in the home for 12 consecutive  months, So, for example a person could live in a nursing home or other medical facility for up to 12 months before the reverse mortgage would be due.
Introduced in the late 1980s, reverse mortgage has helped many senior citizens among home owners who are “house-rich-but-cash-poor” remain in their homes  and still meet their financial obligations.  The proceeds of the loan are tax-free,  there are no minimum income requirements and for most reverse mortgages, the money can be  used for any purpose.

In USA, about which I have  some information there are 3 sources of reverse mortgages, viz,
  1. The federally insured Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (HECM), administered by the Department of Housing and urban Development (HUD).
  2. Single-purpose reverse mortgages, usually offered by state or local  government agencies  for a specific reason.
  3. Proprietary reverse mortgages, offered by banks, mortgage companies, and other private lenders and backed by the companies that develop them.
  4. We shall not go into the details as the purpose of this article is to make aware the readers the availability  of the scheme in other countries.
If you seek as HECM,  you also must undergo free mortgage counseling from an independent government-approved “housing agency.”  Financial institutions offering proprietary reverse mortgages may require similar counseling or home owner education.
Some of the disadvantages of the reverse mortgage schemes are as follows.

  1. Reverse mortgages tend to be more costly than traditional loans because they are rising-debt loans.  The interest is added to the principal loan balance each month.  So, the total amount of interest owed increases significantly with time as the interest compounds.
  2. Reverse mortgages use up all or some of the equity in a home.  That leaves fewer assets for the homeowner and his or her heirs.
  3. Lenders generally charge origination fees and closing costs, some charge servicing fees.  How much is up to the lender.
  4. Interest on reverse mortgages is not deductible on income tax returns until the loan is paid off in part or whole.
  5. Because homeowners  retain title to their home, they remain responsible for taxes, insurance, fuel, maintenance, and other housing expenses.
  6. Payment terms, including acceleration clauses.  They state when the lender can declare the entire loan due immediately.
  7. Some reverse mortgages, the lender may take a share of equity appreciation.  This could create issues for the homeowner or heirs, particularly if the value of the home rises unexpectedly during the loan.
  8. There are some unscrupulous elements among lenders.
If you are considering a reverse mortgage, it is important to understand how the loans work and what your rights and responsibilities are.
Under the “Federal Truth in Lending Act”, lenders must disclose these terms and other information  before your sign  the loan.  On plans with adjustable rates, they must provide specific information about the variable rate feature.  On plans with credit lines, they must inform the applicant about appraisal or credit report charges. Attorney’s fees, or other costs associated with opening and using the account.  Be sure you understand these terms and costs.
You generally have at least three business days after signing a reverse mortgage contract to cancel it.  The cancellation must be in writing.
If you suspect that a lender is violating the law, you can register your concerns with the lender or loan servicer.  You also may wish to file  a complaint with:
 Ø  your state Attorney General’s office or state banking regulatory agency
 Ø  the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  File a complaint online at www.ftc.gov
I have asked some of my banker friends about the possibility of introducing such a facility in India also.  In India, after independence, because of spread of education and communication, the middle class population which was small in pre-independence era has been growing.  Most of us, new middle class, have acquired property with our own earning, that too in cities to which we migrated in search  of employment.  Most of us gave best of the education we could afford to our children taking it as an bounden duty of the parents.  Our children have migrated to better pastures abroad  in search of better opportunities and standard of living.  Many a times we have encouraged them to do so.  Now we live alone supporting ourselves of meager savings and a house to live in.  I personally feel there is an opportunity for banks to step in.  Will the reverse mortgage be a profitable proposition.  My friends abroad in UK and USA say that they know of at least half a dozen private Financial Institutions there who offer reverse mortgage.  Many of the bankers at middle level did not know existence of such a scheme.  At higher level some knew its availability in advanced countries.  They gave a host of reasons why it cannot be introduced in India, not at the moment.  Most frequently mentioned reasons are

·           The inheritance laws of the country
·         Not in the objectives of the commercial banking
·            Non availability of funds
·         Burdened with too many loan schemes with social objectives thrust (?) upon
     Them by Government due political expediency.     The laws of the country and the lengthy process of recovering the possession of the house once the owner passes away.
Indian Bank community is united in risk aversion and avoidance of innovation.  Twenty years ago they did not see any point in entering housing finance or lending on white goods.  I saw first ATM Delhi installed by City Bank an  American Financial Institution.  It took almost a decade for other banks to follow a few Government banks have taken the first step in this direction this year only.  They re used to looking up to Government for directions.  So one can only hope  that  Government will look into this scheme and its relevance to India.  If required the laws could be suitably amended.  Laws should not be  stumbling blocks to progress towards extending greater security, I mean the financial security, to the citizens especially to senior citizens.


No comments:

Post a Comment