The term "Insolvent", in common parlance is
referred as Pauper or Bankrupt. An insolvent is not considered a legal person
for the purpose of enforcement of any obligation committed by him either during
the pendency of insolvency proceedings or after he is adjudged as insolvent.
In India, jurisdiction of the courts to adjudicate a
person as an insolvent has been conferred by two Acts, namely, the Presidency
towns Insolvency Act, 1909, which is applicable in the Presidency towns in
India and the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920, applicable in the muffusil
areas.
To adjudicate a person as an Insolvent, such a person
has to be a "Debtor" and should have committed an act of insolvency.
A debtor, under these Acts, includes only those who are subjected to Indian
laws, either by birth or by domicile including a temporary residence. Thus, a
foreigner cannot be adjudged insolvent by a court in India unless the alleged
act of insolvency was committed or suffered by that person during his personal
residence in India.
Under Indian Laws, as a minor is not competent to enter
into a contract he cannot be adjudged Insolvent even on his own petition. In
the case of a minor being a partner in a firm consisting of adult and minor
partners and if adjudication order is sought against the firm, the same shall
be binding on the firm/partners except the minor.
The expression "Property of an Insolvent",
has been defined as only the property of the insolvent which is divisible
amongst the creditors and not otherwise. It includes any property over which or
over the profits of which any person has the power of alienation which can be exercised
for his own benefit.
The word 'property' includes the right in the property
or things of a person. However, to constitute the property, an insolvent should
have an interest in praesenti to dispose of the same and not such an interest
which may depend upon the fulfillment of certain conditions or contingencies.
Under section 17 of the Presidency Town Insolvency Actor section 28(2) of Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920, after the order of adjudication, the property of an insolvent vests in the Official Assignee and
becomes divisible amongst the creditors, irrespective of its situation.
However, when an order of adjudication has been passed under the Presidency
Town Insolvency Act,1909, any order of adjudication passed against the same
insolvent by the District Court of another place, at a later date under
Provincial Insolvency Act will not operate since the said property is already
vested in the Official Assignee under the Presidency Town Insolvency Act.
The order of adjudication operates as a statutory
transfer to the Official Assignee of all the property of the insolvent person
in India, whether movable or immovable. Similarly, the movable property of an
insolvent situated in foreign country shall vest with the Official Assignee or
Receiver. But, the immovable property of an insolvent situated in a foreign
country, shall be governed by the law of the country within whose jurisdiction
such property is situated.
The property which is divisible amongst the creditors
of the insolvent can only vest with the Official Assignee or the Receiver,
which may be:
1.
Property belonging to an insolvent at the time
of commencement of insolvency proceedings.
2.
Property which may be acquired by or devolve
on the insolvent after the order of adjudication and before his discharge.
3.
Goods in possession, or disposition of the
insolvent.
The properties which are not divisible amongst the
creditors of the insolvent falls into two classes
(a). Property held by the insolvent in trust for any
other person and
(b ). Tools of trade, apparel and other similar
property.
Immediately upon an order of adjudication by the Court,
the property of the insolvent wherever situated vests in the officialassignee/receiver. Till an Official Receiver is appointed by the Court, all the
rights and powers exercisable by the Receiver can be exercised by the Court
itself.
Intervention of Official Assignee is must
The right and interest of an insolvent over the
property do not automatically get transferred in favour of the Official
Receiver upon passing of an adjudication order by the court unless the Official
Assignee intervenes on behalf of the insolvent.
Where the official assignee does not intervene and the
insolvent transfers the said property to another person who takes it in good
faith and for value, the transferee acquires a good title to the property.
With the order of adjudication, the property of the
insolvent vests in the Official Assignee or the receiver and it is the duty of
the assignee to realize such properties of the insolvent expeditiously and to
distribute dividends to the creditors entitled thereto. However, before
exercising the power of realization of properties of an insolvent, abundant
caution has to be exercised by the assignee to avoid unnecessary litigations.
Power to sell: The Receiver is empowered to sell the
insolvent's property without the consent of the Court. But the aforesaid Acts
do not empower the receiver or the official assignee to sell anything more than
the property of the insolvent which vests in him by reason of the adjudication.
Power in case of mortgaged property: Where a Receiver
is appointed by consent of the parties after passing of a decree in a mortgage
suit for sale of such mortgaged property and it is agreed that the receiver
shall recover the rents of the property for a period of one year to hand over
the same to the mortgagee, the mortgagee's right to receive the rents will not
be affected by insolvency of the mortgagor at any time during this period and
neither the official assignee nor other decree- holders will be entitled to a
rate able distribution of such rents.
Section 53 of the Provincial Insolvency Act provides
that a transfer of property not being a transfer in favour of a purchaser in
good faith and for valuable consideration shall, if the transferor is adjudged
insolvent within two years after the date of transfer, be voidable as against
the Receiver. Further, where the debtor transfers all or substantially all the
properties in consideration of the past debts, such a transfer constitutes an
act of insolvency since it has the effect of withdrawing all the property from
the legal process, which his creditors have a right to enforce against the
insolvent.
No comments:
Post a Comment