The Madras High Court has held that an instrument whether a certificate of sale or sale deed, issued in a public auction of properties, was chargeable with stamp
duty under Article 18 read with Article 23 of Schedule I to the Indian Stamp act 1899.
In
an elaborate 48 pages judgment on an application filed by the Official Liquidator, high /Court, seeking general directions, Mr. Justice V.Rama surbramnian
ruled that while the Official Liquidator could leave the choice to the auction
purchaser to choose the title to or nomenclature of the document, neither he
nor the purchaser had any choice with regard to the liability to pay stamp
duty.
Nothing
that there was an emerging trend among purchasers of properties in public auctions to seek issue of “ Certificates of Sale" rather than “ deeds of Sale" the judge
recalled that in Shree Vijayalaxmi Charitable Trust case ( Shree Vijayalakshmi
Charitable Trust Vs Sub Registrar Erode dt. (2009 (5) CTC 15) the view that a certificate of sale did not attract
stamp duty had found acceptance.
But
the question as to whether stamp duty was payable on a certificate of sale was
not examined in the said case on a comparative analysis of all provision of the
Transfer of Property Act 1882, the Stamp Duty Act and the Registration act.1908, and issues of repugnancy and the over riding effect of one Act over the
other, the Judge said. Analyzing the
Transfer of property act, the Judge recalled that the Apex court made it clear
in Raghunath Vs Kedar Nath (1969) (1) SSC 497) that the documents of which registration was necessary, fell within the
scope of Section 49 of the Registration Act and that if not registered, they
were not admissible as evidence of any transaction affecting any immovable
property comprised therein.
Under the stamp Act the Judge said
irrespective of an dehors provisions of the Registration act, a Certificate of sale issued to a purchaser of property sold in public auction, was required
to be stamped as per article 18 read with Article 23 if the purchase money exceeded Rs. The provision of the Stamp act and
the Registration Act operated on parallel lines. Neither of them contains a nonabstante clause
so as to exclude operation of the other. Therefore, the option given under the Registration act to makers of certain
documents, to register them or not, was not to be constructed as an exemption
from payment of stamp duty.
Therefore,
the only conclusion that could be drawn
by a combined reading of the three acts was that by whatever name the
instrument was called, it was chargeable with stamp duty, the judge held.
In
view of the above the application was disposed of with a direction to the
Official Liquidator to issue a certificate of sale or execute a sale deed inline with the choice of the auction purchaser.
No comments:
Post a Comment