Immovable property needs to be valued for sale and purchase to determine the price
payable. Financial Institutions, Banks and moneylenders insist on valuation of
immovable property to ascertain the margin available, worth of the security
offered to Loans. It is a prerequisite for financing Home Loans. Generally the
financial institutions or the housing fiancé companies get the property valued
by their appointed approved values, while the tax authorities follow valuation
as per tax laws and the land and building method.
Valuers are usually
engineers or architects appointed by the Central Board of Direct Taxes under
Section 3A of Wealth Tax Rules 1957. They are also members of the Institution of Valuers, which, incidentally, has a branch in Bangalore. These valuers do
not have any personal interest in the properties, which they value.
There are various
factors, both controllable and non-controllable, which affect the fair market
valuation. Non-controllable factors are macro-economic conditions, political stability, government policy, and price index. Controllable factors are
location, ondition of the property, its surroundings, reputation of the seller;
whether the property is free hold or Lease hold, purpose for which the property
can be used, whether the building byelaws are applicable, floor area ratio
permitted, nature of the soil, size of the plot, occupant of the property, the
shape of the property frontage available and infrastructure available. With the vaastu
being the rage of the day, the shape, road facing also play vital roles.
Any seller who is
moderately intelligent and prudent, would not accept a price lesser than the
market value. The same goes for any purchaser who would definitely not pay more
than the market value at any given time. Thus, fair market value is the price,
that a normal prudent willing owner/seller, not obliged to sell; may reasonably
hope to get from a normal prudent and willing purchaser, with regard to its existing
conditions, with all its merits and demerits, and its potential possibilities.
It is to be noted that the fair market value of the same property keeps changing and valuation is relevant to the time of valuation. Various methods
and techniques are adopted to value the property and arrive at a fair market
value. They are as under:
This is most the
frequently used method and is used by direct tax authorities with slight
modification. The cost of the land is arrived by referring to the recent sales
in the area. The cost of the construction of the building is arrived which is
reduced by the permitted depreciation. Other infrastructural factors like
availability of water, power connection and the relevant deposits are also considered.
Some valuers consider the government rates fixed for the land instead of market
value. Tax authorities follow this method by some modifications, wherein thecost of rebuilding the structure on the land less allowable depreciation is considered.
In this method,
sales of the adjacent immovable properties having similar merits and demerits;
with bonafide intentions; transactions between willing seller and willing purchasers are considered. The proximate date of valuation and the date of
sales are very important. Generally it is assumed that an actual transaction,
with respect to specific property of recent date is a reasonable guide.
Unregistered sale transactions and agreement to sell are not considered. All
the available sales of adjacent immovable properties with the proximate dates
are to be considered and one cannot pick and choose. This method is more
convenient, reducing the element of speculation to minimum.
This is based on rental income of the property. In this method gross annual
rental income of the property is arrived. From out of the gross rental income
and the outgoings to maintain the building and statutory outgoings are
deducted.
The available net rent is multiplied by certain preconceived number of years. The multiplier factor is very important. In early part of 1950's, the multiplier factor was 20 years rent, having regard to the rate of interest on gilt-edged securities.
The available net rent is multiplied by certain preconceived number of years. The multiplier factor is very important. In early part of 1950's, the multiplier factor was 20 years rent, having regard to the rate of interest on gilt-edged securities.
This was gradually changed in 1960 during which period
the banks offered interest at the rate of 7 % to 10% and at present, the rate
of interest is reduced on bank deposits as well as gilt edged securities. In
certain cases the net rental value is multiplied by the remaining age of the
building. This method suffers from certain limitations. The rent may be
unreasonably high or unreasonably low. The property might have been let out
long ago and rent might have remained unchanged for years.This method is more suitable in case of residential
property where is the property is let out recently on prevailing rents /
standard rent.
In this method, the value of the property is arrived by adopting different
methods such as Land and Building Method, Rent Capitalization Method etc., and
the average value of all these methods is arrived at.
This is akin to rent capitalization method. However, the Standard Rent
under rent control act is used to arrive at the gross rent.
There are experts in valuation of immovable properties with necessary
expertise on subject of valuation and have acquired sufficient practical
experience in the field. They are capable of forming independent opinion. The
expert must be given sufficient time to analyze the issue and arrive at the valuation of immovable property. The opinion of the expert is admissible in evidence.
The person who owns property falling under Wealth Tax Act 1957 has to
disclose the market value of the property and pay taxes accordingly. The
disclosures made by the owner in his wealth tax returns should be a good
indicator of the market value of the property. This market value is more
relevant and finds favour with the government while compensating the owner on
acquisition. However, the values disclosed in Wealth Tax Returns cannot be
deciding or conclusive in determining the fair market value but throws some
light on the issue.
Central government has repealed the act during 1999, but many states have
not yet repealed the said act. The Government of Karnataka has, however
repealed the act. Under this act government fixes the rates of market value of
the land in exercise of its power for particular localities from year to year,
which will be guiding factor in arriving at fair market value of the property.
Usually the Land and Building Method, comparable sale method are the much
favored methods with the seller and the purchaser.
No comments:
Post a Comment